Wednesday, March 7, 2007

New York Times - Darwin’s God: the tragedy of human cognition?

This is a very long article - 11 pages long. But I'll try to summarise this article...

Essentially, there are evolutionary theorists ('spandrelists') who have attempted to tackle the question of why religion seems to come so naturally to human beings.

Call it God; call it superstition; call it, as Atran does, “belief in hope beyond reason” — whatever you call it, there seems an inherent human drive to believe in something transcendent, unfathomable and otherworldly, something beyond the reach or understanding of science. “Why do we cross our fingers during turbulence, even the most atheistic among us?” asked Atran when we spoke at his Upper West Side pied-à-terre in January. Atran, who is 55, is an anthropologist at the National Center for Scientific Research in Paris, with joint appointments at the University of Michigan and the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York. His research interests include cognitive science and evolutionary biology, and sometimes he presents students with a wooden box that he pretends is an African relic. “If you have negative sentiments toward religion,” he tells them, “the box will destroy whatever you put inside it.” Many of his students say they doubt the existence of God, but in this demonstration they act as if they believe in something. Put your pencil into the magic box, he tells them, and the nonbelievers do so blithely. Put in your driver’s license, he says, and most do, but only after significant hesitation. And when he tells them to put in their hands, few will.

If they don’t believe in God, what exactly are they afraid of?

...

In short, are we hard-wired to believe in God? And if we are, how and why did that happen?

...

According to them, religion is a byproduct of evolution, and it may offer special benefits, as espoused by the adaptationist school of evolution that proposes the 'group selection' theory.

Thought about their arguments, and I think their arguments, while persuasive-sounding, does have some assumptions that don't seem to hold water very well. But there are some points raised that I agree with. :)

The key problem is that the stance about religion being an evolutionary benefit is putting the cart before the horse. For instance, being altruistic is seen to benefit yourself in the long run, hence enhancing your own possibility of survival. Makes sense, is logical and has been pretty much proven in practise. But does that necessarily mean that since being altruistic works, therefore, it is an evolutionary benefit? It seems to me, at best, a case of affirming the consequent, a logical non-sequitur.

Thus, we need to remember that this argument about religion being an evolutionary by-product rests on the validity of the assumption that evolution is true. As the New York Times article concludes:

And one prominent member of the byproduct camp, Justin Barrett, is an observant Christian who believes in “an all-knowing, all-powerful, perfectly good God who brought the universe into being,” as he wrote in an e-mail message. “I believe that the purpose for people is to love God and love each other.”

At first blush, Barrett’s faith might seem confusing. How does his view of God as a byproduct of our mental architecture coexist with his Christianity? Why doesn’t the byproduct theory turn him into a skeptic?

“Christian theology teaches that people were crafted by God to be in a loving relationship with him and other people,” Barrett wrote in his e-mail message. “Why wouldn’t God, then, design us in such a way as to find belief in divinity quite natural?” Having a scientific explanation for mental phenomena does not mean we should stop believing in them, he wrote. “Suppose science produces a convincing account for why I think my wife loves me — should I then stop believing that she does?”

What can be made of atheists, then? If the evolutionary view of religion is true, they have to work hard at being atheists, to resist slipping into intrinsic habits of mind that make it easier to believe than not to believe. Atran says he faces an emotional and intellectual struggle to live without God in a nonatheist world, and he suspects that is where his little superstitions come from, his passing thought about crossing his fingers during turbulence or knocking on wood just in case. It is like an atavistic theism erupting when his guard is down. The comforts and consolations of belief are alluring even to him, he says, and probably will become more so as he gets closer to the end of his life. He fights it because he is a scientist and holds the values of rationalism higher than the values of spiritualism.

This internal push and pull between the spiritual and the rational reflects what used to be called the “God of the gaps” view of religion. The presumption was that as science was able to answer more questions about the natural world, God would be invoked to answer fewer, and religion would eventually recede. Research about the evolution of religion suggests otherwise. No matter how much science can explain, it seems, the real gap that God fills is an emptiness that our big-brained mental architecture interprets as a yearning for the supernatural. The drive to satisfy that yearning, according to both adaptationists and byproduct theorists, might be an inevitable and eternal part of what Atran calls the tragedy of human cognition.

Hmm. In any case, the Christian faith is about a God who doesn't stand far off, having divided the spiritual and physical realms. On the contrary, "the Word became flesh and made His dwelling among us". And even if we don't know which God is the true God, we still have this knowledge that there MUST be a God somewhere out there. Even most polytheists and pantheists among us humans believe in a Supreme God, the most High God, etc.

As Paul explained to the Athenian Greeks:

22Paul then stood up in the meeting of the Areopagus and said: "Men of Athens! I see that in every way you are very religious. 23For as I walked around and looked carefully at your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: TO AN UNKNOWN GOD. Now what you worship as something unknown I am going to proclaim to you.

24"The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. 25And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else. 26From one man he made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live.

27God did this so that men would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us. 28'For in him we live and move and have our being.' As some of your own poets have said, 'We are his offspring.'

Yup, a very long post... but hope it helps! :)

No comments: