tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5961586317328802574.post5208204314001784813..comments2023-05-10T22:27:20.716+08:00Comments on surprised by wonder: DatingWeizhuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04945640146940053612noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5961586317328802574.post-64022964974554785432011-04-04T08:32:22.398+08:002011-04-04T08:32:22.398+08:00I think your last para does make sense. No doubt a...I think your last para does make sense. No doubt about it.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18445212503267375254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5961586317328802574.post-59680730375546019822011-04-03T01:25:25.232+08:002011-04-03T01:25:25.232+08:00ooooh. :) i ... didn't ... see... it ... comin...ooooh. :) i ... didn't ... see... it ... coming. XD why are you so gifted ah! duly noted!<br /><br />but i think i'm relatively comfortable becos tho he didn't get his point across 100% accurately, i see the general thrust of his argument as in the right direction. :)<br /><br />anyway, i wonder abt theology. Romans is definitely a theological insight into the nature of our salvation... so there is theology in the Bible in the sense that it make sense of Christ and his work on the cross and his resurrection and what it means for our lives and so on... such theology is inerrant (since it's part of the Bible).<br /><br />and there are secondary theologies that aren't written in the Bible but those that we construct in order to have a clearer overall understanding of the big picture. but these, being humanly-constructed, can have some errors here and there... or not v balanced, etc.<br /><br />am i making sense? :)yeu@nnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05692342676158366461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5961586317328802574.post-16123524073039505842011-04-02T14:29:24.090+08:002011-04-02T14:29:24.090+08:00Actually I have been thinking about this post, esp...Actually I have been thinking about this post, especially when this chap starts talking about theology. I realised that he, without realising and while debunking the 'more popular' theology of godly relationship claiming that people have created theology to solve a problem, has actually created a theology to solve the problem of people creating theology to solve a problem. His points are well taken but not his epistemology. His writing is essentially a writing on his theology about dating. In that sense, I guess that's the reason why I am never comfortable with arguments of this sort because it negates in its writing the very issue it is addressing.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18445212503267375254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5961586317328802574.post-41591752170298345222011-03-29T13:28:40.575+08:002011-03-29T13:28:40.575+08:00is that so?is that so?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18445212503267375254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5961586317328802574.post-52902808706373607332011-03-28T18:22:05.063+08:002011-03-28T18:22:05.063+08:00Good point. But I don't think so, not for this...Good point. But I don't think so, not for this context.yeu@nnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05692342676158366461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5961586317328802574.post-58590039242018564862011-03-28T08:19:14.770+08:002011-03-28T08:19:14.770+08:00how about thinking this way, the theology is not c...how about thinking this way, the theology is not created but already there in the first place?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18445212503267375254noreply@blogger.com